Public Register

The eu-LISA Consolidated Annual Activity Report gives a structured overview of the progress made with implementing the Agency’s annual work programme for 2022 and achieving the objectives outlined in the Single Programming Document 2022–2024. This report aims to provide eu-LISA stakeholders with clarity and assurance that the Agency has implemented a systematic and consistent approach to efficiently utilise allocated human

Eurodac is the centralised European database that stores and processes the digitalised fingerprints of asylum seekers and irregular migrants who have entered a European country. This helps determine the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application. Eurodac stands for EUROpean Asylum DACtyloscopy database. Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 603/2013, at the end of each year eu-LISA

This report provides a review of the progress achieved by the EU Innovation Hub for Internal Security in 2022. The report was prepared by the Innovation Hub Team and provides a retrospective on the achievements of 2022. As in previous years, eu-LISA has been an active contributor to the Hub’s activities throughout 2022 and is still the only EU Agency

According to eu-LISA Management Board decision (No 2017-037 REV 1), the working language of the eu-LISA is English. English is also predominantly used by the main stakeholders of the Agency, operating at European level for public consultations, meetings and the publication of technical, legal or policy documents. The vast majority of eu-LISA communication is conducted in English. Where appropriate, the

The SIS II 2022 Statistics Report is the annual public statistical document, published by eu-LISA, presenting a collection of data received from Member States and Associated Countries connected to SIS together with data available from the Central SIS system, as per the legal instruments governing the system. This report is accompanied by a factsheet that can also be found on

Even though some initial works have shown, on small sets of data, that not all fingerprints present the same level of utility for recognition purposes, there is still insufficient data-supported evidence to understand the impact that finger type may have on fingerprint quality and, in turn, also on fingerprint comparison. The present work addresses this still under-researched topic, on a

2022-435 Eurodac 2021 Annual Report

2022-460 Written procedure for a decision of the Management Board to appoint the members of the e-CODEX Programme Management Board